The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please log in.
Posted on May 26, 2023
![A woman wearing a white linen combination suite, with a very fitted top, small sleevelets that cover the armpits (to protect the next layers from sweat) and split drawers. The suite buttons up along the front (where it is a bit tight around the bust) and has a line of lace at the neckline and two tucks plus some lace at the legs. A woman wearing a white linen combination suite, with a very fitted top, small sleevelets that cover the armpits (to protect the next layers from sweat) and split drawers. The suite buttons up along the front (where it is a bit tight around the bust) and has a line of lace at the neckline and two tucks plus some lace at the legs.]()
Some time ago, on an early Friday afternoon our internet connection died. After a reasonable time had passed we called the customer service, they told us that they would look into it and then call us back.
On Friday evening we had not heard from them, and I was starting to get worried. At the time in the evening when I would have been relaxing online I grabbed the first Victorian sewing-related book I found on my hard disk and started to read it.
For the record, it wasn’t actually Victorian, it was Margaret J. Blair. System of Sewing and Garment Drafting. from 1904, but I also had available for comparison the earlier and smaller Margaret Blair. System of Garment Drafting. from 1897.
![A page from the book showing the top part of a pattern with all construction lines A page from the book showing the top part of a pattern with all construction lines]()
Anyway, this book had a system to draft a pair of combinations (chemise top + drawers); and months ago I had already tried to draft a pair from another system, but they didn’t really fit and they were dropped low on the priority list, so on a whim I decided to try and draft them again with this new-to-me system.
Around 23:00 in the night the pattern was ready, and I realized that my SO had gone to sleep without waiting for me, as I looked too busy to be interrupted.
The next few days were quite stressful (we didn’t get our internet back until Wednesday) and while I couldn’t work at my day job I didn’t sew as much as I could have done, but by the end of the week I had an almost complete mockup from an old sheet, and could see that it wasn’t great, but it was a good start.
One reason why the mockup took a whole week is that of course I started to sew by machine, but then I wanted flat-felled seams, and felling them by hand is so much neater, isn’t it?
And let me just say, I’m grateful for the fact that I don’t depend on streaming services for media, but I have a healthy mix of DVDs and stuff I had already temporary downloaded to watch later, because handsewing and being stressed out without watching something is not really great.
Anyway, the mockup was a bit short on the crotch, but by the time I could try it on and be sure I was invested enough in it that I decided to work around the issue by inserting a strip of lace around the waist.
And then I went back to the pattern to fix it properly, and found out that I had drafted the back of the drawers completely wrong, making a seam shorter rather than longer as it should have been. ooops.
I fixed the pattern, and then decided that YOLO and cut the new version directly on some lightweight linen fabric I had originally planned to use in this project.
The result is still not perfect, but good enough, and I finished it with a very restrained amount of lace at the neckline and hems, wore it one day when the weather was warm (loved the linen on the skin) and it’s ready to be worn again when the weather will be back to being warm (hopefully not too soon).
The last problem was taking pictures of this underwear in a way that preserves the decency (and it even had to be outdoors, for the light!).
This was solved by wearing leggings and a matched long sleeved shirt under the combinations, and then promptly forgetting everything about decency and, well, you can see what happened.
![A woman mooning by keeping the back of split drawers open with her hands, but at least there are black leggings under them. A woman mooning by keeping the back of split drawers open with her hands, but at least there are black leggings under them.]()
The pattern is, as usual, published on my pattern website as #FreeSoftWear.
And then, I started thinking about knits.
In the late Victorian and Edwardian eras knit underwear was a thing, also thanks to the influence of various aspects of the rational dress movement; reformers such as Gustav Jäger advocated for wool underwear, but mail order catalogues from the era such as archive.org/details/cataloguef… (starting from page 67) have listings for both cotton and wool ones.
From what I could find, back then they would have been either handknit at home or made to shape on industrial knitting machines; patterns for the former are available online, but the latter would probably require a knitting machine that I don’t currently1 have.
However, this is underwear that is not going to be seen by anybody2, and I believe that by using flat knit fabric one can get a decent functional approximation.
In The Stash I have a few meters of a worked cotton jersey with a pretty comfy feel, and to make a long story short: this happened.
![a woman wearing a black cotton jersey combination suite; the front is sewn shut, but the neck is wide and finished with elastic. The top part is pretty fitted, but becomes baggier around the crotch area and the legs are a comfortable width. a woman wearing a black cotton jersey combination suite; the front is sewn shut, but the neck is wide and finished with elastic. The top part is pretty fitted, but becomes baggier around the crotch area and the legs are a comfortable width.]()
I suspect that the linen one will get worn a lot this summer (linen on the skin. nothing else need to be said), while the cotton one will be stored away for winter. And then maybe I may make a couple more, if I find out that I’m using it enough.
- cue ominous music. But first I would need space to actually keep and use it :)↩︎
- other than me, my SO, any costuming friend I may happen to change in the presence of, and everybody on the internet in these pictures.↩︎
blog.trueelena.org/blog/2023/0…
Calligrafae
in reply to David Revoy • • •Mx Amber Alex (she/it) 😷
in reply to David Revoy • • •MagicLike 🏳️🌈
in reply to Mx Amber Alex (she/it) 😷 • • •Mx Amber Alex (she/it) 😷
in reply to MagicLike 🏳️🌈 • • •David Revoy
in reply to Mx Amber Alex (she/it) 😷 • • •Kit Rhett Aultman
in reply to David Revoy • • •Abandoned
in reply to David Revoy • • •@amberage @MagicLike
Rebuilding this might need a bit of accountability and a structure which makes such mistakes harder in the future.
No one needs their emotions wired directly into a pain button that hurts thousands and stux needs to make sure this not not how mstd blocking works in future.
Calligrafae
in reply to MagicLike 🏳️🌈 • • •:thonk:
in reply to David Revoy • • •@davidrevoy
David Revoy
in reply to :thonk: • • •Elena ``of Valhalla'' likes this.
Madayar
in reply to David Revoy • • •Pietervdvn
in reply to David Revoy • • •ManicDee
in reply to David Revoy • • •pardon my ignorance, is "mstdn.social" the same as "mastodon.social" or a different instance?
Is there any kind of documentation on how to keep track of who I'm following so that I can restore broken follows the next time mastodon.social breaks the fediverse or is otherwise excommunicated by other instances?
David Revoy
in reply to ManicDee • • •@manicdee They are different, but I also mixed up the two instances at first so I think many will have the same feeling. Their naming really overlaps too much; it just sounds like one is the URL shortening of the second... I could disambiguate the two by their number of active users mainly:
- mstdn.social/explore (31K active users)
- mastodon.social/explore (220K active users)
Mastodon
Mastodon hosted on mastodon.socialManicDee
in reply to David Revoy • • •Experiencer (Mastodon)
in reply to David Revoy • • •Helgi Crookehorne
in reply to David Revoy • • •nellie-m
in reply to David Revoy • • •CEbbinghaus
in reply to David Revoy • • •Tonya Canning
in reply to David Revoy • • •Hughster
in reply to David Revoy • • •mastodon.art/about
Shephallmassive
in reply to David Revoy • • •Loukas (They/Them) 🏳️⚧️
in reply to David Revoy • • •Henry
in reply to David Revoy • • •Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to Henry • •@Henry there are instances that really everybody wants to block at a server level, because they aren't sending any kind of useful message but just plain, uncontroversially, spam.
Our instance only has less than 10 active users and no open registration, so we can afford do be very permissive, and we still have a blocklist that is mostly filled with those.
Then there are instances that have been created with the explicit intent to host people accounts dedicated to harass other people: one may prefer a place where these are blocked in advance or one where blocks only happen after the fact, but while under active attack you don't really want every user on a server to suffer from them either.
And then there is simply the fact that some user will want to manage their own block list, but others are much more happy knowing that an admin *they trust* has done most of the work.
The point is that the fediverse gives you the choice to be on a server where you trust the admin and like their policies, removing instance blocks from everybody (or enforcing them for everybody, if it was technically possible) would make it worse, not better.
florian
in reply to David Revoy • • •Gen X-Wing
in reply to David Revoy • • •That is a lovely piece of art!
(Aah, can’t keep it in. Viking helmets didn’t have horns:) That looks like a Wagner opera:) But I don’t think it takes away from the image. It kinda makes me think of some management type game. Like a Settlers of the World type game.)
ArneBab
in reply to David Revoy • • •