After the dotcom bust 20 years ago, there was a shift away from attempts to turn the Internet into a portal owned by a single company (AOL, Yahoo, etc) using incompatible and proprietary tech, in favor of open standards.
This spawned a heydey for things like self-hosted blogs, RSS and XMPP powered by Linux. People rejected lock-in and embraced the benefits and freedom open standards brought. Even Big Tech embraced these standards.
Elena ``of Valhalla'' reshared this.
doctorambient
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •Kyle Rankin
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •So why did it change? There are a few causes, and this pendulum between open and closed tech is always swinging, but to me the single most important cause was the advent of the smartphone.
Smartphones allowed tech companies to rewrite the rules around standards, software, lock-in and #privacy as Big Tech companies all sought to control the new personal computer with rules people would have rejected on their laptops. The rush to control SMS and news portals killed XMPP and RSS, respectively.
Kyle Rankin
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •reshared this
Henry Edward Hardy e Mobian reshared this.
Kyle Rankin
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •After people get used to tech without lock-in, companies will need new tech that allows them to rewrite the rules. I suspect VR/AR will be the the technology that will allow companies to lock folks back in. It is the next evolution to make a computer that is even more personal than a smartphone.
This is clearly why Meta is all in on this tech and why Apple is exploring the space as well. Whoever controls this tech controls the portal into the virtual and real world. We will need to be vigilant.
Mirko Adam
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •kurtseifried (he/him)
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •Also reunning services 24/7 with even 99.9% reliability is well beyond most peoples capability, and even if they have the capability do they want to do it? I used to have a full rack in a data center to host seifried.org. Now it's an S3 bucket/Cloudflare. Email is Gmail. I don't want to run all these services and deal with spam/trying to get my email not marked as spam.
Isn't the whole point of IT to automate things and make them more reliable? This tends to lead to consolidation.
Kyle Rankin
in reply to kurtseifried (he/him) • • •@kurtseifried In this discussion I'm talking more about open standards than I am self-hosting. You were able to move your email to Gmail so easily because email is an open standard. You could move sites to S3/CF because of the open web standards the services and browsers communicate with.
People who are moving to Mastodon have to wholesale rebuild things from scratch because they were moving away from a closed standard. The lock-in and friction to leave a platform to a competitor is by design.
kurtseifried (he/him)
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to kurtseifried (he/him) • •@kurtseifried (he/him) @Kyle Rankin OTOH, do we really need 99.9% reliability for a social network instance with a handful of users? or even for email?
sometimes the server I'm on breaks in the middle of the night, the first one who tries to open it in the morning tells one of the people with the relevant Powers, and it gets fixed.
no need for notifications or anything
no need to bring it back up in the middle of the night when nobody is using it anyway, it will get the messages when it goes back up in the morning.
I think it's on at least 95% of the time, and that's more than enough.
kurtseifried (he/him)
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla'' • • •@valhalla Store and forward protocols are different (e.g. email vs web server) and Mastodon definitely lends itself to higher latency/less synchronized communications. But you'll still have to deal with things like running out of disk space, moderation, paying for the domain name, updating software, backups (you want backups right?) and all that. It's non-trivial work.
It's easy to build a table if you own all the woodworking tools and have a garage and build cabinets for a living.
Kyle Rankin
in reply to kurtseifried (he/him) • • •@kurtseifried @valhalla The beauty of open standards, open protocols, and services built on free software is that it provides the option for folks who are able to, to self-host, most can't/won't, so with sufficient demand, others who are able and willing to, can offer their own hosted services to potential customers (either free or for a fee/donations/etc).
The consumer can then choose the service (and service provider) that best serves their needs, ability, and budget, just like with email.
like this
PublicLewdness e Elena ``of Valhalla'' like this.
Kyle Rankin
Unknown parent • • •@StryderNotavi @maikelthedev They are *getting* that education now.
The last time around, I think many folks were not using the Internet and computers during the previous era of lock-in so they had no reason to understand the future harms and risks of embracing it.
It takes time for a company to abuse lock-in it for more money/marketshare in a way that the customer feels. The walled garden seems great unless you want to leave it. The cloud-dependent appliance is great while the service is up.
Notavi
Unknown parent • • •@maikelthedev While I agree that we shouldn't, if we're discussing lock in and social networks then we kinda have to also consider that others might not consider their decision so carefully.
Which means we've got work to do educating people, because allowing these technologies into our lives generally has non-obvious consequences and we'd be better off if more people understood that.
Notavi
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •Henrik Hemrin
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •Jake Damon | jakedamon.lens
in reply to Kyle Rankin • • •