Salta al contenuto principale


β€œMy hot take on β€œ15 minute cities” is if you can get to the coffee shop within fifteen minutes, but the barrista who makes your drink can’t afford to live closer than a half-hour away, then you live in a theme park.” - Gareth Klieber #cities #urbanism
in reply to thomas bohn

@thomas bohn @Dan Wentzel πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ I think that was the point, but I don't have the context. Whatever the original intent, in this form I agree 100%:

You and the barista get to the coffee shop in 15 mins = 15 mins city

You get to coffee shop in 15 mins, barista commutes = theme park

in reply to thomas bohn

We need a name for posts like this - both technically correct and yet completely missing the point.

Yes - they don't live in a 15 minute city. But most people aren't aware enough to notice that if *their* travel and commute is within 15 minutes, and politicians are cynical enough to exploit that.

Thus the need to remind people that 15 minute city needs to apply to more than just them.

in reply to clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’›

I'd be inclined to call that a distinction without a difference.

The point was made and clearly understood. Quibbling about semantics is just pointless pedantry.

in reply to Notavi

@Notavi @thomas bohn @Dan Wentzel πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ It is clear for me from seeing this post all over the internet that the point was not clearly made, much less clearly understood.

Lots of people respond to it like "that's right, 15-minute cities are an elitist project that does nothing for normal people, just abandon it", which means it just fueled a misunderstanding. Wording matters.

in reply to Dan Wentzel πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ

I so agree. I think about the Cleaner travelling from home to home, the Babysitter, the parents taking their kids to their school of choice, the university student, the tradespeople.... the idea behind low traffic or no traffic might be inspiring but in practice it cannot work.
in reply to clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’›

@clacke: seeking πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’› @Trillian βœ…βœοΈ πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‘ @Dan Wentzel πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ Indeed, I can get that universities may have to be a bit more remote (ideally with enough local housing for the students, however), but there is really no reason not to have schools up to something like 8-ish gradeΒΉ everywhere, and some variation of quality will happen, but having outright bad schools is quite an evil in itself that should be fixed.

ΒΉ the actual grade depends on how schools work in a specific country, but something around that.

(and I say this as somebody who doesn't exactly like living in a 15 minutes town)

Unknown parent

Gabor
are there really big cities with "mixed-cost housing"? Kind of hard for me to even imagine.
Questa voce Γ¨ stata modificata (1 anno fa)
in reply to Dan Wentzel πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ

Is this a quote from a paper? I would like to put this in a paper that i'm writing for my uni :)
in reply to clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’›

I'm kind of surprised that my post of this quote has gone viral on both Mastodon and on Twitter -- which I didn't even post myself . Someone else took an image of my Mastodon post and put it on the bird site. It's not even my quote. Someone texted me today and said, "Are you back on Twitter, because you've gone viral." Hahaha.
in reply to Dan Wentzel πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ

Ah, yes, the Portland problem, where the median income is roughly a 30-hour/week part-time minimum-wage job but the average rent is $2000/mo...
in reply to Baloo Uriza

@BalooUriza
[nod] Some people think you can just cycle your way out of this. Cycles are great, but no. You can't. :/
in reply to widdle_smol_bisnuzz_bean 🐚

This. Need real regulation on minimum wages and maximum rents. Also @danwentzel isn't entirely accurate on the theme park aspect, as this also happens for a bit in a city that is making improvements but still has a long way to go.
in reply to Baloo Uriza

@Baloo Uriza @Dan Wentzel πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ @Pesach_Krab πŸ¦€ It's fair to call it a theme park or other derogatory label until it gets there.

If it's going the right direction, that's of course good to acknowledge too. But in particular, acknowledge that the right direction exists and is achievable and don't make the criticism sound like it's all hopeless and a scam and we should just keep making even worse plans.

Questo sito utilizza cookie per riconosce gli utenti loggati e quelli che tornano a visitare. Proseguendo la navigazione su questo sito, accetti l'utilizzo di questi cookie.

⇧