Salta al contenuto principale


We're going to wake up one day soon and discover that nobody makes printers any more that don't snitch on your activities to the Secret Police (b/c the public internet is dead, the olgarch social media is in the pocket of the aforementioned SP, and samizdat is … well, if your printer OCR's and emails it to the authorities that's you doing 10-20 years for "encouraging terrorism", innit).

Prolly time to buy a second-hand 1980s dot-matrix and a ribbon re-inking kit.
infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/1…

in reply to Charlie Stross

I think the Epson Ecotank series of inkjet printers is still the best (mainstream) bet. Don’t despair quite yet.
in reply to Bob Dowling

An inkjet is great if you print a few times a week, but if you leave it idle any longer you risk the print head clogging. For infrequent use a monochrome laser can't be beaten. I have a second hand HP4250N (with duplexer) which is built like a tank and goes from doing nothing for months to printing out half a ream at once without complaint. I thought it was faulty once, but a new (off brand) toner cartridge fixed it.
in reply to Paul Martin

@nowster @bob_dowling HP lasers from before about 2005 were built like brick outhouses and you could count on them … so many people did, HP began to lose sales, and then enshittified the new products to ensure they could make revenue targets on toner alone. HP printers after about 2010 are basically trash.
in reply to Charlie Stross

@nowster @bob_dowling

Still regretting the bag of silver I took for my HPLJ5 during one of their "sales events". Dimmed the entire house when the fusor kicked on, but was way past unstoppable.

in reply to Charlie Stross

Laser printers at least have been snitching on us for decades at this point, no?
in reply to Charlie Stross

also, computers. Throw away your smartphone/laptop (they all serve the oligarchs and/or CCP’s security organs), build something from a junkbox Z80 and program it in BASIC/assembly to do what you need. (Make sure it’s a genuine old Z80, and not a modern emulation running on an ARM SoC along with the obligatory layers of spyware.)
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to Charlie Stross

It's also important that people know that most printers print a code on their output that traces the printout back to that specific printer. It's usually in pale, unobtrusive yellow dots. (This is why your printer wants you to replace the colour cartridge even if you're just trying to print in black.) Created ostensibly to trace printers being used to counterfeit currency.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_…

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to BeeCycling

@beecycling That's why I'm recommending a 1980s dot matrix, from before watermarking of inkjet and laser printer output with the Constellation EUrion became A Thing.
in reply to Charlie Stross

Definitely. Just wanted to mention the printer dots too, because most people don't know about them, and think that something printed out and distributed on paper can't be traced back to or linked to them. It absolutely can.
in reply to BeeCycling

@beecycling Someone I know, who will remain nameless unless they choose to reveal themselves, had programmed their Postscript printer to print the yellow dot pattern specific to Euro banknotes on all their correspondence with the authorities.
in reply to BeeCycling

Okay, so asking to confirm if I'm remembering correctly:

All color machines do the dots, this is why printers refuse to print if they don't have a working color/yellow cartridge... but fully black and white machines (typically only laser printers, and not color machines set to B&W only) do not do this. Am I remembering that correctly?

in reply to Glowing Cat of the Nuclear Wastelands

@deathkitten @beecycling I have not tested this, but I suspect you can see the dot patterns if you print a test page using a sheet of black or pale blue paper (pale blue = yellow gives green). It's a hack on the human eye which has difficulty distinguishing yellow from a white background.
in reply to Charlie Stross

I have an almost 20 years old HP LaserJet 1018, works like a charm, plenty of third-party toner+drum sets, I think I'm set for now.

(I also have a second HP LaserJet 1018 in the basement just in case this one croaks, two is one and one is none :-)).

in reply to Leszek Karlik

@Leszek_Karlik Similar. There's an ancient Laserjet 3030—a B&W multifunction—gathering dust outside my office door, and an in-use colour laserjet in $SPOUSE's office from just before the enshittification kicked in—it has a JetDirect card for network printing over 10BaseT but and probably does watermarking but doesn't phone home or use anticounterfeiting measures.
in reply to Frank’s Ting

@franksting @kcarruthers Yes and for your dishwasher, they recommended Cascade, which is about the worst thing you can put in your machine.
in reply to BrianKrebs

@briankrebs @franksting @kcarruthers I sincerely hope the NYTimes outsources all subediting and copywriting jobs for this sort of shitty clickbait to ChatGPT, then gets sued into a smoking crater in the floor of the Marianas Trench when somebody follows its suggestion and puts their baby through the dishwasher on a hot cycle.
in reply to Charlie Stross

Do B&W lasers also print dot patterns? I'd imagine those would be quite a bit more noticeable than yellow ones…
in reply to Jernej Simončič �

@jernej__s AIUI B&W laser printers don't do that. You can't forge realistic-looking banknotes with them, which was the original reason for the regulations requiring dot patterns in output. (There was a problem with high denomination Euro forgeries off colour lasers and inkjets in the 90s.)
in reply to Charlie Stross

don't think anyone's going to rootkit my Adana letterpress, but...
in reply to Charlie Stross

I still have some old Apple dot matrix etc. printers. They're in good shape. I haven't thought about seeing if I could bring them back to life. 🤔

I do keep a basic, non-internet-connected Brother black-and-white toner printer around for bulk printing. That thing is incredibly useful.

Unfortunately I bought an HP tank printer over a year ago, but I haven't set it up yet. Maybe I need to rethink that choice, but it's way too late to return it. ☹️

in reply to Charlie Stross

Typewriter with carbon paper, and a stencil setting + a mimeograph for bulk copying. Bonus retro ink smell.

If you want more modern tech, a 1980's daisywheel or ball electronic typewriter with a PC port/adaptor. (probably just copy the file to LPT1, but it's been a while).

in reply to Tony Wells

@TonyJWells Who manufactures carbon paper today? Or mimeograph stencils? Even typewriters? (A search for "typewriter" on Brother's website shows nothing but discontinued models ...)
in reply to Charlie Stross

Carbon paper is still made, I have some new stock. Typewriters are still made in small numbers, but awful quality, there are plenty decent 2nd hand ones that will likely last many more decades.
Mimeograph stencils can still be had, last I checked, from Japan , but it's very niche. However, like analogue film and various audio recording formats, if there's demand, someone will start making them .
in reply to Charlie Stross

@Charlie Stross @Tony Wells I think that carbon paper is still manufactured for art related uses.

it's also priced accordingly, and I have no idea whether it's the type that would work in a typewriter.

in reply to Charlie Stross

If your printer accepts third party cartridges, it's probably not spying on you
in reply to Charlie Stross

All printers capable of colour, as far as I know, print a virtually invisible pattern of yellow dots encoding their serial number onto every page, and have done for decades.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_…

I've directly witnessed a scanner get halfway though the EURion constellation on a tenner and just stop, halfway through the note.

Questo sito utilizza cookie per riconosce gli utenti loggati e quelli che tornano a visitare. Proseguendo la navigazione su questo sito, accetti l'utilizzo di questi cookie.