It's amazing how cyclists will make almost exactly the same arguments in favour of riding their private bikes everywhere that car drivers make in favour of driving their private cars everywhere.
At a certain point, private transportation does not scale, and that applies to bicycles too.
Sure, it happens at WAY higher volumes for bikes than for cars, but it does happen.
I don't want trains and stations getting filled up by private bikes. I want more room for people to take public transit.
Not Just Bikes π³π±
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •If you read my posts as "we should ban all bikes on trains" then you have problems with reading comprehension.
Yes, you should BE ABLE to take a bicycle on a train sometimes.
That is totally different than "train companies should encourage people to take their bicycles on trains and add extra bike carriages to their trains."
It should be POSSIBLE to bring a bike on a train but a) it should not be encouraged & b) there should be an extra charge to account for the space taken up by the bike.
Dario Zanette
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I see your point and understand it. And (partially) agree.
But what if the private bike on train is a good foldable one, wich can easily fit between the seat rows, taking mostly the same space of a luggage?
This kind of bikes need no extra space, no extra wagon..
Gemma βοΈπ°πΊπΈ π΅π π
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I don't understand, though. Why should it not be encouraged? Why should there be an extra charge? The marginal cost of adding an extra train car or even an extra train is likely not exhorbitant and carries additional benefits.
Furthermore, I doubt there will ever really be *that many people* who want to bother with taking a bicycle on a train.
Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to Gemma βοΈπ°πΊπΈ π΅π π • •@Gemma βοΈπ°πΊπΈ π΅π π @Not Just Bikes π³π± @Ati the marginal cost of adding an extra car could be very low, or it could be extremely high, depending on whether the trains that are running are already at the maximum length for the stations they serve.
And adding one extra train may be extremely expensive when an area is already running at capacity.
And anyway it would be one less extra car / train for other passengers.
Of course it depends on the time of the day: on the commuters' trains around Milan bicycles are usually allowed, trains have room for them etc. and usually are not an issue, but they are not allowed during rush hour, when close to Milan trains tend to be already filled to the brim with standing people. (and of course at that hour the system in that area is already running at capacity, with trains that are as long as possible and as frequent as possibile)
Ati
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla'' • • •Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to Ati • •Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla'' • •Ati likes this.
Ati
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla'' • • •Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to Ati • •@Ati @Gemma βοΈπ°πΊπΈ π΅π π @Not Just Bikes π³π± yeah, but there the car infrastructure wasn't already at capacity, there was room to expand it, and that's what people did
the places I'm thinking about have both train and car infrastructure at capacity, and no room to expand eitherΒΉ, because there is also a housing crisis, and space to build anything is frigging expensive.
and you can't just add another car to a train when the train is already as long as the station, and on either side of the station you already have tall-ish apartment blocks that prevent any expansion (and if you could, it should be for people, not for bikes).
ΒΉ in the area where the congestion is. they have tried to build more car infrastructure just outside of it, where land is cheaper and less developed, to try and reduce the congestion from people who didn't really need to go through the congested point but around it, but it didn't really work.
Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla'' • •Ati
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla'' • • •Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to Ati • •@Ati @Gemma βοΈπ°πΊπΈ π΅π π @Not Just Bikes π³π± I'm saying that whenever people can't just hop on the train with a bike and find place for it, it's probably not cheap nor easy to find a solution.
while on the places where it would be easy, there is probably no need to find a solution to a problem that is not there in the first place.
and yes, the case where there is this problem tend to be at least small cities (the place I know more of is in Italy, we don't have *mega* cities here)
Ati
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla'' • • •Ati
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Jean-FranΓ§ois Mezei
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •If you can find it:
20241004_cemp_workshop_bikesluggage_all.pdf
NL was the outlier in resisting handling of bikes on trains , but will abide to EU rules.
pixx
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I'm more in agreement with b) than with a)
I'm fully on board with encouraging it and having a dedicated cargo space SO LONG AS I have to pay for it properly.
It's one thing I like about amtrak's policy: if you have a normal bike, that's a fee. if you have a folding bike that fits in the same volume as luggage: you can use it as a carry-on, for free, _instead of luggage_.
It means that you're encouraging usage of portable bikes on mass transit over bulky ones, giving a reasonable option, and requiring that said reasonable option be paid for by the people utilizing it, not everyone else
I find this quite reasonable overall
Iris Young (he/they/she) (PhD)
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •SLeiBt
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Fuzzbizz
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Karl Heinz HΓ€sliprinz
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •π΅πΈπΊπ¦ lazy home worker
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Janek Bevendorff
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Space Hobo
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Trantion
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •adamarmfield
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •FranΓ§ois
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •StΓ©phanie
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Trassliga havssnΓΆret Tomas
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •exactly, bikes on trains is not for commuting with your bike on the train, because that's not scaleable. And it might discourage people from taking transit because of lower level of comfort if there is too many bikes on board.
But to be able to bring your quite normal bike on a train occasionally, either with a fee and or not during high traffic times. Preferably with ticket-statistics on weather its possible to bring a bike or not when booking a train. Most trains are not full.
szakib
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •DerivativeThoughts
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •RenΓ© K.
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Antifamiek
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Soso
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I disagree with that.
For things like work commute having rental bikes on both ends is ideal, but renting a bike for a holiday traveling is just not a good experience.
Cycle tourism is a good thing, and it can only happen if there are spaces on trains for bikes.
I'm fine with having to pay extra/travel outside of rush traffic, but there should be an option. Otherwise you're forcing cyclists to take the car, which they might not even own, or killing a good green tourism option.
sndein
in reply to Soso • • •dragonfrog
in reply to Soso • • •@sgued sure there are cases where taking your bike on the train makes sense, but they're edge cases - 95% of the people who want to use a bike at the other end of their train ride aren't on a bikepacking tour, they just want a bike to get from the train station to their nephew's apartment in town.
Same way 95% of the people driving private cars on the highway aren't going on a camping trip, they're going to a town a reasonable rail network would get them to just fine.
π΅πΈπΊπ¦ lazy home worker
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Andreas Sikkema
in reply to π΅πΈπΊπ¦ lazy home worker • • •@radiotea imagine trying to setup a cycle hire scheme that crosses borders (start in France, end up in Switzerland or start in NL and end in DE because 3 weeks only gets you so far) π²
If only railway companies had a scheme where I could send the bike as cargo instead of luggage. *cough*
Nakob
in reply to π΅πΈπΊπ¦ lazy home worker • • •stefanct
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •confracto
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Γtienne Parmentier
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Pete
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Maythee A.
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •surely bazkie π©πΌβπ»
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •can't fully agree with this, since size matters. bikes take about 10x less space than cars.
stations filled up with private bikes is not a good argument either, since they would otherwise hire an OV fiets, which takes.. the same amount of space!
not wanting bikes on trains, okay, that's a fair argument. tho I suppose one could fix it by adding a specialized bike compartment to each wagon, which you can use for a fee. the fee would offset the cost of the extra amount of train needed. π€·ββοΈ
I think it'd scale fine, after all, a bike is about the same size as a person, so if bikes on public transport don't scale, people on public transport wouldn't scale very well to start with.
bigger problem with cars is the amount of road they need.. a bike sitting on a train really doesn't compare. like in the space a car takes on a road, you could fit like 200 bikes in the same space in a train..
Sarah Peper π³οΈββ§οΈπΊπ¦
in reply to surely bazkie π©πΌβπ» • • •@bazkie Bikes on a train take the space of maybe 3 to 6 people*, they are not the same size as humans
* depending on the type of bike and what infrastructure exists
Licho
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Sieva π΄πποΈπΉ
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I think having a limited number of reservable bike spots on trains is a good thing. Bikes don't take much space and they aren't heavy, but they let you do certain types of activities. Something similar (although of a higher priority ofc) is when we accommodate people with strollers or mobility scooters on transit.
I don't particularly like how some train operators simply let you come on a train only when there's enough capacity; it just adds a level of uncertainty to the trip.
crowdotblack
in reply to Sieva π΄πποΈπΉ • • •Lidsel
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Mia βMeetings? I Abstainβ Luna Tearmoon
in reply to Lidsel • • •couldnβt agree more (and things are just plain worse outside places like the Netherlands)
Itβs especially taxing on lower income people who ride personal bikes to save on transit but bike share schemes donβt usually have any accommodation for them
Teaceratops/GameDev Mum
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I think there needs to be room for both.
City-owned bikes are great for most people, but there's a growing number of us who are disabled and ride adapted bikes. Often these adaptions are not noticed by other people, or are not obvious, but are quite important for us. I would like trains to continue to expand their bike spaces, the same way I want them to do so with wheelchair spaces; but I would like able-bodied folks to be conscious of this, and do as you by incorporating city-owned bikes into their journey, so that cycling and public transport is still accessible for those of us who are disabled.
(And to maybe, please, leave the end spaces on bike racks free, to accommodate our sometimes odd-shaped bikes).
But I do hope folks don't do the old 'how dare you park in the disabled space/take the disabled seat' thing they do when our disabilities aren't visible.
yetzt
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Lou Cyx
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I love biking, but I 100% agree with you. The issue isn't "cars", but "private transportation", which includes bikes.
If biking is still required, that's a failure in public transportation and lack of walkable infrastructure.
Mia βMeetings? I Abstainβ Luna Tearmoon
in reply to Lou Cyx • • •if it isnβt required but some people would like to bring their personal bicycles on board because they otherwise have no time for exercise, is this still wrong?
Iβm blessed with a short commute but I have a colleague who takes the train (with her bike) on stormy days because hers is 30 km
Public transit takes 2 hours (have to take the train to the very centre of the city then a bus back out into the hills), cycling is 1 hour, cycling + train is around an hour too
And bike share bikes here are entirely unsuitable for longer distances
Tina
in reply to Lou Cyx • • •@loucyx Disagree. "If biking is still required, that's a failure in public transportation and lack of walkable infrastructure." With exception of the velomobile the bicycle is the single most energy efficient way of transportation we have. Thus biking can be a very efficient way of getting the last mile if we design public transportation accordingly.
And really, this is a non-problem. The OP kind of assumes almost everyone would have a bike on public transit. But if we look at reality there is never more than a few bikes on a train. Because not everyone requires or uses a bike.
Even more, most modes of public transportation are not interesting to cyclists. Going a few stations by subway, tram or bus? Most cyclists would simple cycle the part.
Of course, it might be that one is tired or hurt, or even just that the weather is bad and a cyclist takes a few stations by bus. But that is a very small minority.
More relevant though is regional train services: Taking 50km by bike each day might not be feasible, but combining bike and regional trains means quite good accessibility, even in more rural places.
Marion Grau
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Number6
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •The OV bikes are heavy, have no gears, and you need to know how to use the back-pedal for braking. And, if memory serves, they run 5 euro a day. Also, not available to non-residents, so you need a resident friend's OV card to get them.
One alternative that's great for the "last kilometer" problem is a kick-scooter. I didn't see these in the Netherlands, but they would be a good fit. They fold smaller than a person, and can go everywhere.
Monapp
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Koen
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I think there are probably two needs here that are both partially being met - those of the commuter / urbanist and those of the cycling enthousiast.
For commuters I would agree a larger OV fiets plan would be the better approach.
For the enthousiast, no rental will be a full replacement in terms of enjoyment and need. I'm not sure why train-bike facilities should not scale with their demands as well. Taking the bike in the train is already (rightly) a hastle over OV-fiets...
Koen
in reply to Koen • • •root42
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •If long distance trains had a well organised bike car you can easily transport fifty bikes on a single train. But that doesnβt scale so well with demand. Hence most bike cars have foldable seats so you can also put people in there.
root42
in reply to root42 • • •I think there is no βone size fits allβ which is what I am reading into your arguments (apologies).
doephin
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •if I couldn't take my bike on the train I couldn't *use* the train; my destinations are out of walking range from the stations.
Bikes extend transit range.
Rental services could cover that, but they'd have to be common enough to be a guarantee, and actually fit me.
saxnot [offline b/c festival]
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •many properties of the bike make it much more preferable / the infrastructure much more preferable than the same for cars.
Bruce Adams
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •justJanne
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •I still feel like both options are missing something, no matter which city you're in, but I've been wondering for years how to solve it (without success)
If I cycle with my own bike, I might not be able to take it on the train later. If I use a rental bike and the train, there might not be a rental bike at the destination station.
If I take my bike to the station, leave it there and go downtown, it's inconvenient if I later end my journey at a different station near my home.
Xerunala
in reply to justJanne • • •DFX4509B (Joshua Mason)
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Magnus Ahltorp
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •For normal cases, yes, using rental bikes at the destination is more reasonable than taking your own bike on the train.
But I doubt that occupying a rental bike for a week because you need to go outside of town is very efficient, and certainly not anywhere near the scope of the current OV-fiets system.
GemNico
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •the last time i took my bike on the train was to get it to a repair place 4 towns away.
and to move a bike from the station near work and bring it home. i mostly do try in peak season to avoid bike-on-train because it is kind hassle city.
Not Just Bikes π³π±
in reply to GemNico • • •@GemNico yes, that makes perfect sense.
I never suggested that bikes should NEVER be brought on trains, just that train companies should not be ENCOURAGING people to bring bicycles on trains.
Of course you should be able to take your bike on a train for the purposes you're suggesting. There should likely be an extra fee for it, given the extra space you're taking up, but sure, it's a perfectly good use-case for taking a bike on a train.
Nina Felwitch
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •DavidS
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •That's false equivalence. Drivers don't expect to be able to take their cars on trains.
People with bikes would like to be able to travel further afield. Why should there only be space for people carrying suitcases? A bike is just different shaped luggage!
fedithom
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Honestly, a selfish person is a selfish person. It might show a bit more clearly when they are behind the wheel in 2 tons of steel, but if you look closely, you can tell when they barrel down the walkway on a bike as well. :)
Sergei Smagin
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •that's reasonable but also those are problems for the better times for most of the countries I imagine. In Serbia you have to pay for your bike on a train and there are only so many space for them but I haven't seen this being an issue for people. Tiny (by Dutch standards) bike parking is rarely full either.
Maybe because despite I live in the most cyclist town here (Novi Sad), other towns are less friendly for biking and I'd rather wait for a bus or call a taxi there.
Martijn Vos
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •Leeloo
in reply to Not Just Bikes π³π± • • •