Salta al contenuto principale


I'm seeing a lot of proclamations that there should be no exceptions to describing your images or that there's no reason to interact with any that aren't described.

I know these mean well, but they are themselves ableist.

Disabled people know that access needs can clash. I benefit from described images, but I know some people struggle to write them because of their own disabilities.

And that's okay! The culture of image descriptions is great here but it should never be absolutist.

in reply to Erik

I challenged someone on their hardline stance on this once, and it blew up into a tiny fedi drama, with the nice outcome of more social solutions.

That's around the time people started to CW undescribed images.

My instance developed an emoji :help_describe: to indicate you'd like a media description added.

There's a group you can tag, @imagecaptionspls, that people follow who are willing to add descriptions.

And there's @PleaseCaption to remind you if you forget.

in reply to Erik

Please describe:

* your jokes/memes - it's no good saying "this is just silly, you're not missing anything"; let us be the judge of that! Also, being disabled isn't about being dull and worthy all the time.

* your artwork - I'm so sad when I see cool art I can't boost (and sometimes can't even discern :) )

* your gifs and videos - description isn't just for still images!

* your audio clips - yep, these can be described too!

reshared this

in reply to Erik

about β€œdescribing your images”:
In the ActivityPub forum, there is also a thread about writing a formal Fediverse Enhancement Proposal.
This goes then to all the implementors, developers, writers of ActivityPub software.

weex started it there and said:
β€œWhen media such as images and video are uploaded and shared without captions, it excludes the visually impaired from knowing what the content is.

To address this, some user interfaces highlight such media so that people can be more easily made aware of this deficiency in what they may share. People can then reply to ask for a captioned repost, or decide whether they want to share or otherwise engage with such content.”

I have added this thread there too, the Link is socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/…

/ @aral

in reply to Sebastian Lasse

When I upload pictures I add descriptions. However I am not sure whether I do things right, because I fall to notice the descriptions after uploading them.
in reply to alternative_beβœ…πŸ––πŸ»

apparently the descriptions on the official mobile apps only work with a screenreader (they don't show on the app!). They are however showing on other apps or desktop/laptop...
in reply to Erik

*Especially* when your joke is really dumb and simple, just write the punch line. That way people who can't see the image get the joke, and people who don't get the joke *also* get the joke
in reply to Rockario

Yeah another thing image descriptions are really good for is explaining jokes that depend on particular cultural references, because not everyone will understand those. Since I don't watch much TV or live in the U.S., I've learned where lots of meme templates come from thanks to image descriptions. :)
in reply to Erik

Are other instances free to use this emjoi, and if so, what are the terms, who can I credit and would they like credit on the .art website aside from just in a toot?
in reply to Off On One

This question got asked the other day and here's the answer given by its creator then! mspsocial.net/@t54r4n1/1082276…
in reply to Erik

Since I first wrote this, a good cultural norm that has found its way to fedi is the hashtags Alt4Me (where you can ask for an image description) and Alt4You (where you can add one to a toot that lacks it).

Also, most instances have edit functionality now, which makes it really easy to add the image description back into your toot if someone adds one for you!

in reply to Erik

idk what you call very easy but mastodon doesn't let you edit an image description when editing a post
in reply to 2,000 trained rats :ace:

Oh is that not a mainline thing? Heck. My instance uses Hometown and I can't keep track of what is a feature of what.

Back before editing image descriptions was possible, though, the received wisdom seemed to be that if you removed and then re-uploaded the photo, you could add the description then. That still doesn't seem overly difficult, as general advice goes.

in reply to Erik

I think it's easy to forget that often we are posting an image *because* we can't find the right words.
in reply to Fish Id Wardrobe

Which doesn’t preclude describing the image so others can also understand the metaphor you’re using to convey the concept that you’re finding difficult to explain in words :)
in reply to Aral Balkan

@ar.al🌻 @Fish Id Wardrobe sometimes the words one can't find aren't metaphors, they are instructions on how to do something, and adding a picture or a video is meant to explain that (and if somebody was able to describe it fully in words, there would be no need for the image)
in reply to Erik

great and true post, the overall fediverse push to caption images is great and really should be done a lot more across the web... and yeah as someone who struggles sometimes to have energy to write captions sometimes my images have to go uncaptioned for a bit until i have more energy

only wanted to add also that having read the official web standards, alt text (afaik) can also be left blank if the image has contextual text next to it that would render alt text redundant

in reply to Toffee

You can't. You can delete and re-draft to add the description. (If you edit the toot, you have to delete and re-upload the media to get the chance to describe it.)
in reply to Erik

@brave paws, in cuddle format 🩼 @Toffee Update: As of a few months back, this is no longer true for recent Mastodon versions. Editing the post and editing the alt text is possible and effective.

Questo sito utilizza cookie per riconosce gli utenti loggati e quelli che tornano a visitare. Proseguendo la navigazione su questo sito, accetti l'utilizzo di questi cookie.

⇧