Salta al contenuto principale


Programmers have, for some reason, problems with big vs little endian architectures and data. I think it was a mistake for CPUs to not choose an endianness randomly at boot time.

Henry Edward Hardy reshared this.

in reply to Lars Wirzenius

"should CPU endianness be big or little? My compromise of counting bits outward from the middle was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration."
in reply to Lars Wirzenius

Why have preference options when you could automatically switch between them?
in reply to Lars Wirzenius

you'd be surprised. most CPUs actually do that: they generate a single random bit and use that to pick the endianness for that session. the problem is that, after much debate on which bit value should select which endianness, most CPUs ended up with code that selects one endianness for one and not the other for not one. not a true story, but still...
in reply to Lars Wirzenius

but no, endianness is not confusing if you look at it from just the right perspective and orientation
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla''

oh, you're right! or left! I guess it depends on how you look at it, and on your perspectives. but it's probably not the most significant issue to be right about, or not. not the least significant either. it's got just the right amount of significance left

Questo sito utilizza cookie per riconosce gli utenti loggati e quelli che tornano a visitare. Proseguendo la navigazione su questo sito, accetti l'utilizzo di questi cookie.