The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.
I love the Fediverse so much that @feline tattooed it on my arm ππ β
rag. Gustavino Bevilacqua reshared this.
I love the Fediverse so much that @feline tattooed it on my arm ππ β
rag. Gustavino Bevilacqua reshared this.
nicolas β
in reply to Tommi π€― @ NOAW • • •nicolas β
in reply to nicolas β • • •@FediverseSymbol (I quickly made a more relevant starry eyed emoji: codeberg.org/fediverse-symbol/β¦ )
grinning-face-with-asterism-eyes
Codeberg.orgwakest β
in reply to Tommi π€― @ NOAW • • •Tommi π€― @ NOAW
Unknown parent • • •@mario Me too π
I wanted to add a red heart around it, but Feline suggested to see how I feel without it, and maybe we can add it later
Louis
in reply to Tommi π€― @ NOAW • • •axolotl solidario
in reply to Tommi π€― @ NOAW • • •i thought this was the fediverse symbol.
Tommi π€― @ NOAW
in reply to axolotl solidario • • •@axolotl That is one version, the first ever used. @FediverseSymbol proposed the asterism because it has a particular meaning, itβs simple, beautiful, and itβs an Unicode character!
The Fediverse is open and truly free by definition. This implies that there is no βofficialβ logo. There are potentially countless way anyone can use to represent it, as they best see fit.
I think the asterism is perfect, though.
Elena ``of Valhalla''
in reply to Tommi π€― @ NOAW • •@Tommi π€― @axolotl solidario @Fediverse Symbol β the asterism can't be perfect, it's lacking rainbowness :D
(which admittedly makes it easier to screen print, or cutting it from vinyl etc.)
Tommi π€― @ NOAW likes this.
Fediverso reshared this.
raphaΓ«l β bastide
in reply to Elena ``of Valhalla'' • • •Rainbow asterism glyph
stolon.raphaelbastide.comElena ``of Valhalla'' likes this.
Zekovski π§£
in reply to Tommi π€― @ NOAW • • •I much prefer the pentagram.
No argument for the asterism makes sense for me.
Elena ``of Valhalla'' likes this.
Tommi π€― @ NOAW
in reply to Zekovski π§£ • • •Henning
in reply to Tommi π€― @ NOAW • • •Tommi π€― @ NOAW
in reply to Henning • • •